pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#102,208,140
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #102,208,140
9 transactions · 7 stateful · 2026-09-05 14:26:58 UTC
Parallelism
67
/100
Blocked
29
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.33
Longest chain
3
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#102,208,140
· 9 txs across 3 waves · depth 3
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
#0
syscallReward
#1
execOrders
#2
0x5acec890
· blocks 2
#3
0x59558d29
#4
execute
#5
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#7
setData
#6
execOrders
· blocks 1
#8
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2
w0
6
w1
8
w2
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xe5bb3628…e5f1
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x7aad02c6…b979
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x2eb15031…f48d
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x1368c0ff…46af
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x2877f440…c2c8
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x338a6d86…5701
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x38c094c2…a251
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x48d4896a…d0c6
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
3 conflicts on slot
0xe5bb3628b5…71e5f1
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity