← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #102,216,828
25 transactions · 23 stateful · 2026-09-05 15:10:58 UTC
Parallelism
84/100
Blocked
39%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.6
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #102,216,828 · 25 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w315w016w118w019w121w122w123w224w3
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002f
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xfac61869…a562
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x7a57bb93…7efb
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity