pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#102,233,540
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #102,233,540
65 transactions · 59 stateful · 2026-09-05 16:35:32 UTC
Parallelism
45
/100
Blocked
80
%
Avg conflicts / tx
7.55
Longest chain
36
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#102,233,540
· 65 txs across 36 waves · depth 36
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
wave
w7
wave
w8
wave
w9
wave
w10
wave
w11
wave
w12
wave
w13
wave
w14
wave
w15
wave
w16
wave
w17
wave
w18
wave
w19
wave
w20
wave
w21
wave
w22
wave
w23
wave
w24
wave
w25
wave
w26
wave
w27
wave
w28
wave
w29
wave
w30
wave
w31
wave
w32
wave
w33
wave
w34
wave
w35
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xab083028
· blocks 3
#2
0x5acec890
· blocks 9
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 29
#32
0xab083028
#34
execOrders
· blocks 1
#42
execOrder
#44
0x59558d29
#45
0x0c7abd22
#46
0x0c7abd22
#47
0x0c7abd22
#48
0x0c7abd22
#50
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#52
executeBatch
#57
transferWithAuthorization
· blocks 2
#60
0x6a9c44d7
#61
setData
#62
execOrders
· blocks 2
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 28
#31
0xab083028
#33
execOrder
· blocks 5
#54
0xed82b078
· blocks 1
#58
transferWithAuthorization
· blocks 1
#5
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 27
#55
0xed82b078
#59
transferWithAuthorization
#6
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 26
#7
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 25
#8
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 24
#9
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 23
#10
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 22
#11
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 21
#12
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 20
#13
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 19
#14
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 18
#15
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 17
#16
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 16
#17
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 15
#18
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 14
#19
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 13
#20
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 12
#21
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 11
#22
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 10
#23
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 9
#24
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 8
#25
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 7
#26
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 6
#27
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#28
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#29
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#30
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#35
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 7
#36
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#40
execOrder
· blocks 4
#37
0x5acec890
· blocks 2
#41
execOrder
· blocks 6
#38
0x5acec890
· blocks 1
#43
execOrder
· blocks 4
#56
execOrders
#39
0x5acec890
#49
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 3
#51
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 3
#53
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#63
execOrders
· blocks 1
#64
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w0
3
w0
4
w1
5
w2
6
w3
7
w4
8
w5
9
w6
10
w7
11
w8
12
w9
13
w10
14
w11
15
w12
16
w13
31
w1
33
w1
35
w28
37
w30
38
w31
39
w32
40
w29
41
w30
49
w32
53
w34
54
w1
55
w2
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
60 touches
435 conflicts
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
60 touches
435 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb87
0x1b6862…e19c
60 touches
435 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
60 touches
435 conflicts
0x8543ca94…7d0a
0xd32edf…ff58
59 touches
435 conflicts
0x53c41998…7d52
0x34b655…2a6f
14 touches
21 conflicts
0x482471ad…122f
0x34b655…2a6f
12 touches
15 conflicts
0xaee0ae91…1771
0x34b655…2a6f
8 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
435 conflicts on slot
0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity