← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #102,277,445
20 transactions · 18 stateful · 2026-09-05 20:18:06 UTC
Parallelism
75/100
Blocked
39%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.5
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #102,277,445 · 20 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w35w06w415w116w219w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xd0ec60a1…d240
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0018
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0028
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x88a2c8b2…4c5e
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0xd0ec60a15c…75d240
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity