pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#102,312,820
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #102,312,820
33 transactions · 17 stateful · 2026-09-05 23:17:21 UTC
Parallelism
88
/100
Blocked
24
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.21
Longest chain
4
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#102,312,820
· 33 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
#0
syscallReward
#1
execute
#2
0xaf5e395a
#3
0x610b9968
#4
0x50a0b275
#5
execute_route
#6
0x575c0012
#7
0x00921418
#8
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#11
main_all
#12
main_all
#13
execute
#14
execute
#15
execute
#16
0x0fbe0059
#17
0x4f819052
#18
0xab083028
· blocks 1
#19
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#20
0x5acec890
#21
0x5acec890
#22
0x1c597517
#23
0xe3a3c9cc
#24
0x62be7533
#25
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#26
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#27
setData
#30
0x6a9ca304
#31
0xc7068c7b
#32
execOrders
#9
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#29
0xed82b078
#10
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#28
0x0c7abd22
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
8
w0
9
w1
10
w2
18
w0
28
w3
29
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x7f25abb5…492a
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0b000000…0002
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00f7e3b7…e015
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00f7e3b7…e016
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00f7e3b7…e018
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xc32b2f3b…1cba
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xc32b2f3b…1cbb
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
FastLane: FastLaneAuctionHandler
6 conflicts on slot
0x7f25abb563…81492a
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity