← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #102,325,320
16 transactions · 16 stateful · 2026-09-06 00:20:39 UTC
Parallelism
69/100
Blocked
63%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.94
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #102,325,320 · 16 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w35w36w48w110w111w213w215w2
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xe5060fe3…ebe4
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0019
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0029
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x6269f201…ead6
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0xd9f18d9a4a…7f141d
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity