← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #102,476,105
20 transactions · 16 stateful · 2026-09-06 13:04:30 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
38%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.4
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #102,476,105 · 20 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w05w06w19w210w114w016w118w019w3
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001c
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…002c
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xac79a0c7…be13
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xaad6be10…0801
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
1 conflict on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity