pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#102,568,329
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #102,568,329
24 transactions · 20 stateful · 2026-09-06 20:52:19 UTC
Parallelism
71
/100
Blocked
55
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.17
Longest chain
7
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#102,568,329
· 24 txs across 7 waves · depth 7
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xab083028
· blocks 1
#2
0x4297b034
#4
0xab083028
#5
execOrder
· blocks 4
#6
execOrders
#9
0x3e2e8792
#14
execOrder
#16
execOrder
#17
0x59558d29
#20
setData
#21
setData
#23
updateTemporalNumericValuesV1
#3
0xab083028
#7
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#8
0x5acec890
· blocks 7
#10
0x5acec890
· blocks 2
#13
execOrder
· blocks 3
#11
0x5acec890
· blocks 2
#15
execOrder
· blocks 2
#12
0x3e2e8792
#18
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#19
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#22
execFwdPositionOpsV2
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
3
w1
5
w0
7
w1
8
w2
10
w3
11
w4
12
w5
13
w3
15
w4
18
w5
19
w5
22
w6
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xfb682e7d…dde9
0x34b655…2a6f
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xc824469a…6425
0x34b655…2a6f
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xca841faa…486a
0x34b655…2a6f
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x031120c7…5bf2
0x34b655…2a6f
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xf2432f3e…b35d
0x34b655…2a6f
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x4ac4a2c2…2707
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x5d1ac445…5233
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x482471ad…122f
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
10 conflicts on slot
0xfb682e7d8c…dcdde9
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity