← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #102,641,233
18 transactions · 17 stateful · 2026-09-07 03:01:09 UTC
Parallelism
78/100
Blocked
65%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.06
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #102,641,233 · 18 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w05w17w29w210w311w112w213w314w216w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd996735f…8735
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x021b6338…856b
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000013
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity