pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#102,863,775
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #102,863,775
21 transactions · 20 stateful · 2026-09-07 21:44:02 UTC
Parallelism
62
/100
Blocked
60
%
Avg conflicts / tx
2.05
Longest chain
8
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#102,863,775
· 21 txs across 8 waves · depth 8
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
wave
w7
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 11
#8
execOrders
· blocks 1
#9
0x5acec890
#10
0x59558d29
#11
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#15
0x3f5c179b
#18
setData
#19
execOrders
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#7
execOrder
· blocks 6
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#12
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 5
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#13
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 4
#5
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#14
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 3
#6
0x0c7abd22
#16
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 2
#17
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#20
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
5
w4
6
w5
7
w1
12
w2
13
w3
14
w4
16
w5
17
w6
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xc824469a…6425
0x34b655…2a6f
14 touches
21 conflicts
0x39c74a05…785b
0xd32edf…ff58
11 touches
15 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…001c
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…002c
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x0a6cb118…4ca7
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x194b1f6e…f27a
0x34b655…2a6f
10 touches
10 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
21 conflicts on slot
0xc824469a90…af6425
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity