← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #102,867,342
25 transactions · 23 stateful · 2026-09-07 22:01:59 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
39%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.8
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #102,867,342 · 25 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w35w47w010w214w015w116w217w020w021w123w3
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…001c
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…002c
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x792299c4…16b5
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xd2c6b199…5d81
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
10 conflicts on slot 0xd9f18d9a4a…7f141d
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity