← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #104,206,099
23 transactions · 16 stateful · 2026-09-12 14:42:33 UTC
Parallelism
78/100
Blocked
50%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.65
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #104,206,099 · 23 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4w05w16w27w38w49w017w119w120w021w122w2
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x91945265…e592
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…002f
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xa352142f…db58
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
10 conflicts on slot 0x9194526550…eee592
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity