← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #106,003,615
18 transactions · 17 stateful · 2026-09-18 21:55:16 UTC
Parallelism
89/100
Blocked
12%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.17
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #106,003,615 · 18 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w010w014w116w017w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xef16e7da…d088
0x6f6493…b480
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0f6e4786…a866
0x6f6493…b480
4 touches
1 conflict
0x278a2067…1205
0x6f6493…b480
4 touches
1 conflict
0x572d9927…5a8f
0x6f6493…b480
4 touches
1 conflict
0x69ee622c…a529
0x6f6493…b480
4 touches
1 conflict
0x8abf527f…1306
0x6f6493…b480
4 touches
1 conflict
0x9024ffd3…756f
0x6f6493…b480
4 touches
1 conflict
0xabcb48e5…363c
0x6f6493…b480
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: 0x6f6493e3…08b480
1 conflict on slot 0xef16e7da92…e3d088
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity