← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #106,015,987
16 transactions · 16 stateful · 2026-09-18 22:57:31 UTC
Parallelism
69/100
Blocked
38%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.56
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #106,015,987 · 16 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
4w05w17w28w210w311w312w4
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…001b
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb83
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xa12c9b6c…23c8
0xd32edf…ff58
5 touches
3 conflicts
0x08f9abf1…10bf
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xcc8faac2…c766
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
3 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…00001b
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity