pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#106,042,912
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #106,042,912
22 transactions · 21 stateful · 2026-09-19 01:13:01 UTC
Parallelism
68
/100
Blocked
52
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.09
Longest chain
7
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#106,042,912
· 22 txs across 7 waves · depth 7
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#4
execOrders
#6
0x59558d29
#7
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#8
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#9
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 5
#15
0xed82b078
#16
0x6aade1a1
#17
setData
#18
execOrders
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#10
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 4
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#11
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 3
#5
0x5acec890
· blocks 1
#12
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 2
#13
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 1
#19
execOrders
· blocks 2
#14
0x1ea3e879
#20
execOrders
· blocks 1
#21
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
5
w3
7
w0
9
w0
10
w1
11
w2
12
w3
13
w4
14
w5
19
w4
20
w5
21
w6
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x13a344c4…5ec9
0x6f6493…b480
11 touches
15 conflicts
0x18a966db…b9c1
0x6f6493…b480
11 touches
15 conflicts
0x18a966db…b9c5
0x6f6493…b480
11 touches
15 conflicts
0x2249d86b…93d6
0x6f6493…b480
11 touches
15 conflicts
0x22b3a226…5857
0x6f6493…b480
11 touches
15 conflicts
0x22b70a84…16a1
0x6f6493…b480
11 touches
15 conflicts
0x236cb9fc…b1fc
0x6f6493…b480
11 touches
15 conflicts
0x2623529b…4f9c
0x6f6493…b480
11 touches
15 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0x6f6493e3…08b480
15 conflicts on slot
0x13a344c44b…485ec9
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity