pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#106,110,067
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #106,110,067
24 transactions · 23 stateful · 2026-09-19 06:50:58 UTC
Parallelism
75
/100
Blocked
39
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.83
Longest chain
6
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#106,110,067
· 24 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xab083028
#2
execOrders
#3
0x5acec890
#4
0x928e4afa
#5
0x5acec890
#6
0x59558d29
#7
0x59558d29
#8
execOrders
· blocks 2
#10
setData
#11
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 2
#13
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 5
#19
predictAndBet
#21
proposePrice
#22
0x6aae30d6
#9
execOrders
· blocks 1
#14
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 4
#20
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#23
execOrders
#12
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#15
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 3
#16
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 2
#17
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 1
#18
0x1ea3e879
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
8
w0
9
w1
11
w0
12
w2
13
w0
14
w1
15
w2
16
w3
17
w4
18
w5
20
w1
23
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x068c1156…a261
0x6f6493…b480
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x0d60eaee…c7d8
0x6f6493…b480
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x1c26b3e2…2ae2
0x6f6493…b480
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x22e69351…4b87
0x6f6493…b480
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x22ea8331…0060
0x6f6493…b480
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x2351c405…5d2e
0x6f6493…b480
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x37916e53…509d
0x6f6493…b480
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x4398159b…4eba
0x6f6493…b480
12 touches
15 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0x6f6493e3…08b480
15 conflicts on slot
0x068c1156cc…0fa261
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity