← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #106,185,699
19 transactions · 17 stateful · 2026-09-19 13:11:37 UTC
Parallelism
79/100
Blocked
35%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.37
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #106,185,699 · 19 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w05w16w07w18w09w110w3
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x17a7f697…dcb7
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x7df837d8…bee2
0xd32edf…ff58
5 touches
3 conflicts
0xabde8104…c9a9
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0x0b552eae…fbd9
0x754704…b603
4 touches
1 conflict
0x57f2a444…88a5
0x754704…b603
4 touches
1 conflict
0x5f55f2c8…8f11
0x754704…b603
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
3 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity