pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#106,207,279
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #106,207,279
22 transactions · 19 stateful · 2026-09-19 15:00:16 UTC
Parallelism
77
/100
Blocked
58
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.68
Longest chain
5
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#106,207,279
· 22 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#7
0x59558d29
#8
0x59558d29
#9
execPerpOps
#10
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#12
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#15
forward
#17
transferWithAuthorization
· blocks 1
#19
setData
#20
0xe26aed…1888
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#5
0xefdb8189
· blocks 3
#18
transferWithAuthorization
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#11
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#16
execOrders
· blocks 1
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#13
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#14
0xed82b078
#21
execOrders
#6
0xab083028
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
5
w1
6
w4
11
w2
13
w3
14
w3
16
w2
17
w0
18
w1
21
w3
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002f
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x07b5c6c6…886a
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x733073b1…9a46
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot
0xd9f18d9a4a…7f141d
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity