pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#106,308,244
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #106,308,244
22 transactions · 21 stateful · 2026-09-19 23:28:24 UTC
Parallelism
77
/100
Blocked
38
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.77
Longest chain
5
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#106,308,244
· 22 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#4
0xab083028
#5
0x59558d29
#6
execOrders
· blocks 1
#7
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 2
#8
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#9
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#10
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 3
#14
updatePosition
#15
updatePriceFeedsIfNecessary
#17
0x6aaf1a9b
#18
setData
#19
execOrders
· blocks 2
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#11
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 2
#16
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#12
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 1
#13
0x1ea3e879
#20
execOrders
· blocks 1
#21
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
6
w0
7
w0
10
w0
11
w1
12
w2
13
w3
16
w1
19
w0
20
w3
21
w4
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x3a254d1c…508c
0x73ca90…1130
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x07e864fa…1537
0x6f6493…b480
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xb4e9ce6c…bc2b
0x6f6493…b480
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd2d46a81…cb3f
0x6f6493…b480
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xfa07ad9a…008c
0x6f6493…b480
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x3a254d1c…508b
0x73ca90…1130
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x142f15cc…ba11
0x6f6493…b480
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x1d8d053d…88ec
0x6f6493…b480
8 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0x73ca9094…0c1130
6 conflicts on slot
0x3a254d1ce3…0c508c
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity