pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#106,370,956
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #106,370,956
24 transactions · 23 stateful · 2026-09-20 04:44:00 UTC
Parallelism
75
/100
Blocked
52
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.25
Longest chain
6
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#106,370,956
· 24 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
#0
syscallReward
#1
execOrders
· blocks 5
#5
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#7
0x5acec890
#8
0x59558d29
· blocks 1
#12
setData
· blocks 1
#17
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#18
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#19
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#21
0xffb62b9c
#22
execOrders
#23
execOrders
#2
execOrders
· blocks 4
#3
execOrders
· blocks 4
#6
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#9
0x59558d29
#13
setData
#4
execOrders
· blocks 3
#10
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#14
execOrders
· blocks 3
#11
0x0c7abd22
#15
execOrders
· blocks 2
#16
execOrders
· blocks 1
#20
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w1
4
w2
5
w0
6
w1
8
w0
9
w1
10
w2
11
w3
12
w0
13
w1
14
w2
15
w3
16
w4
20
w5
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x947bb79d…6458
0x34b655…2a6f
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001a
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb82
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x1b25f260…c429
0x34b655…2a6f
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x2686eb58…7c02
0x34b655…2a6f
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x49b9fdd5…9c16
0x34b655…2a6f
8 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
Perpl
6 conflicts on slot
0x947bb79d75…ca6458
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity