pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#106,383,446
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #106,383,446
24 transactions · 21 stateful · 2026-09-20 05:46:52 UTC
Parallelism
75
/100
Blocked
52
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.08
Longest chain
6
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#106,383,446
· 24 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
#0
syscallReward
#1
0xab083028
#2
updatePrices
· blocks 1
#4
0x5acec890
· blocks 3
#6
0x59558d29
#7
0x59558d29
#8
setData
#9
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#10
0x3f5c179b
#11
0xffb62b9c
· blocks 5
#17
0x6aaf7350
#18
0x61d59c2d
#19
execOrders
#3
updatePrices
#5
0x5acec890
· blocks 1
#12
0xffb62b9c
· blocks 4
#13
0xffb62b9c
· blocks 3
#20
execOrders
· blocks 3
#14
0xffb62b9c
· blocks 2
#21
execOrders
· blocks 2
#15
0xffb62b9c
· blocks 1
#22
execOrders
· blocks 1
#16
0xffb62b9c
#23
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2
w0
3
w1
4
w0
5
w1
11
w0
12
w1
13
w2
14
w3
15
w4
16
w5
20
w2
21
w3
22
w4
23
w5
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x053ca6ed…b00a
0x5be4ee…673f
11 touches
15 conflicts
0x053ca6ed…affc
0x5be4ee…673f
11 touches
15 conflicts
0xd98b3c10…67b8
0x34b655…2a6f
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x51fc8795…126f
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xca841faa…486a
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x7dd96c96…7335
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xb75367ff…a2b7
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xca544518…82c2
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0x5be4ee8b…b7673f
15 conflicts on slot
0x053ca6ed91…abb00a
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity