pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#106,393,102
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #106,393,102
18 transactions · 18 stateful · 2026-09-20 06:35:28 UTC
Parallelism
39
/100
Blocked
72
%
Avg conflicts / tx
2.06
Longest chain
11
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#106,393,102
· 18 txs across 11 waves · depth 11
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
wave
w7
wave
w8
wave
w9
wave
w10
#0
syscallReward
#1
execOrders
· blocks 1
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 8
#6
0x59558d29
#11
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#2
execOrders
· blocks 2
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 6
#12
0x3f5c179b
#5
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#7
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#8
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#9
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#10
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#13
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#14
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 3
#15
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#16
execOrders
· blocks 1
#17
execOrders
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w0
4
w1
5
w2
7
w3
8
w4
9
w5
10
w6
12
w1
13
w7
14
w8
15
w9
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
16 touches
28 conflicts
0x00000000…001a
0x1b6862…e19c
16 touches
28 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb82
0x1b6862…e19c
16 touches
28 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
16 touches
28 conflicts
0x1f37da50…59b1
0xd32edf…ff58
15 touches
28 conflicts
0xca841faa…486a
0x34b655…2a6f
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x309f47c0…e1cf
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x3b65c5ca…9f83
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
28 conflicts on slot
0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity