pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#106,404,240
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #106,404,240
17 transactions · 16 stateful · 2026-09-20 07:31:30 UTC
Parallelism
65
/100
Blocked
56
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.18
Longest chain
6
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#106,404,240
· 17 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#3
execOrders
· blocks 1
#5
execOrders
#6
setData
#8
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 5
#15
0x61d59c2d
#16
execOrders
#2
0x0c7abd22
#4
execOrders
· blocks 2
#9
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 4
#7
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#10
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 3
#11
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 2
#14
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#12
0x1ea3e879
· blocks 1
#13
0x1ea3e879
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w0
4
w1
7
w2
8
w0
9
w1
10
w2
11
w3
12
w4
13
w5
14
w3
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x0d379efd…541e
0x6f6493…b480
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x1671a1ae…be92
0x6f6493…b480
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x2ddaa8b0…eb66
0x6f6493…b480
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x2e7c7e3d…0cfb
0x6f6493…b480
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x37b06a28…0949
0x6f6493…b480
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x3ee20c23…b3e1
0x6f6493…b480
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x407a0d6a…41c6
0x6f6493…b480
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x40ab0b41…b12d
0x6f6493…b480
12 touches
15 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
0x6f6493e3…08b480
15 conflicts on slot
0x0d379efd13…62541e
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity