← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #106,404,369
15 transactions · 14 stateful · 2026-09-20 07:32:09 UTC
Parallelism
60/100
Blocked
43%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.07
Longest chain
6 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #106,404,369 · 15 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
wave w5
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w03w16w27w38w49w514w5
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…001a
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb82
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x96b6e15d…7c17
0xd32edf…ff58
11 touches
15 conflicts
0x31c4594c…ede7
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xaad6be10…0801
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0xca841faa…486a
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
15 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…00001a
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity