← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #106,429,769
9 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-09-20 09:39:59 UTC
Parallelism
44/100
Blocked
44%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.11
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #106,429,769 · 9 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
3w04w16w27w38w4
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…001b
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb83
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x03991611…c761
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0x53e50026…6d8c
0x34ae4d…3fc5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x7f4a8466…f2cc
0x34ae4d…3fc5
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
10 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity