← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #106,458,335
10 transactions · 10 stateful · 2026-09-20 12:03:49 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
10%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.1
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #106,458,335 · 10 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w06w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…001c
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xcb45d9d6…cb84
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x85316774…f451
0xd32edf…ff58
3 touches
1 conflict
0x3d13406e…eff1
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x7c216fca…20cb
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
0xdec2aeb2…0586
0x34b655…2a6f
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
1 conflict on slot 0xd9f18d9a4a…7f141d
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity