pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#106,535,869
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #106,535,869
24 transactions · 21 stateful · 2026-09-20 18:34:02 UTC
Parallelism
79
/100
Blocked
52
%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.04
Longest chain
5
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#106,535,869
· 24 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
#0
syscallReward
#1
execute
· blocks 5
#2
0xaf5e395a
#3
0xcf7468f4
#4
main_all
#5
setData
#6
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 4
#10
0xe10c815c
#11
execOrders
#12
updateDataFeedsValuesPartial
#20
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#21
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#22
execOrders
· blocks 1
#7
0xab083028
· blocks 3
#8
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 7
#23
execOrders
#9
0x4297b034
· blocks 1
#13
0xe3a3c9cc
· blocks 1
#14
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#18
0x3f5c179b
#15
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#17
0x62be7533
#19
0xed82b078
#16
0x0c7abd22
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
6
w0
7
w1
8
w1
9
w2
13
w2
14
w2
15
w3
16
w4
17
w3
18
w2
19
w3
22
w0
23
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x2269c600…b19b
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb85
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xaad6be10…0801
0x2a68ba…90c5
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x46cb45de…a566
0x188d58…ea8e
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xa1087a5c…66c4
0x754704…b603
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
FastLane: FastLaneAuctionHandler
10 conflicts on slot
0x2269c6008c…51b19b
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity