← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #106,556,288
8 transactions · 8 stateful · 2026-09-20 20:16:47 UTC
Parallelism
38/100
Blocked
50%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.25
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #106,556,288 · 8 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w25w36w4
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…001e
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb86
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xf6704490…be93
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0xaad6be10…0801
0x2a68ba…90c5
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x2f74f175…9287
0x34ae4d…3fc5
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x3ba7edbb…80e6
0x34ae4d…3fc5
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
10 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…00001e
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity