← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #106,570,102
17 transactions · 15 stateful · 2026-09-20 21:26:19 UTC
Parallelism
59/100
Blocked
47%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.06
Longest chain
7 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #106,570,102 · 17 txs across 7 waves · depth 7
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
wave w5
wave w6
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w04w17w28w39w412w514w615w016w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb86
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x00000000…001e
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0xc47879a4…f88d
0xd32edf…ff58
11 touches
15 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x18cf3003…51d1
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0xaad6be10…0801
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
15 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity