← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #107,444,290
12 transactions · 12 stateful · 2026-09-23 22:47:46 UTC
Parallelism
58/100
Blocked
42%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.67
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #107,444,290 · 12 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
3w04w16w28w39w311w4
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb87
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x26306853…0df0
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0x8fae5c0a…4b4c
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xaad6be10…0801
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0x7aad02c6…b979
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…00001f
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity