← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #107,803,740
22 transactions · 20 stateful · 2026-09-25 04:59:03 UTC
Parallelism
82/100
Blocked
40%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.55
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #107,803,740 · 22 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w39w010w112w013w117w119w020w121w2
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001e
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002e
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xba5743c7…21c5
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x7957c9ac…4e1a
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity