← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #107,816,190
23 transactions · 20 stateful · 2026-09-25 06:01:42 UTC
Parallelism
78/100
Blocked
45%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.7
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #107,816,190 · 23 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w04w15w26w37w48w09w110w113w214w215w3
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb87
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xaad6be10…0801
0x2a68ba…90c5
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001f
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x6a3a0387…5fbc
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0xc7679110…572d
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x9ad325f5…cc43
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity