← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #107,841,867
25 transactions · 17 stateful · 2026-09-25 08:10:56 UTC
Parallelism
80/100
Blocked
29%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.32
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #107,841,867 · 25 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w39w411w012w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x98067f20…59ea
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xbec22ef7…1a5c
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0xd8939279…caf2
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x12309510…0ac2
0x000000…012a
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…002f
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000013
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity