← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #108,286,215
10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-09-26 21:27:20 UTC
Parallelism
60/100
Blocked
44%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.7
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #108,286,215 · 10 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w03w15w26w38w09w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0018
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb80
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xef6890fa…0912
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0x09106a95…1467
0x33176b…e078
4 touches
1 conflict
0x1b5d2e60…99b5
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x2877f440…c2c8
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0xd9f18d9a4a…7f141d
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity