← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #108,335,562
17 transactions · 15 stateful · 2026-09-27 01:35:39 UTC
Parallelism
65/100
Blocked
47%
Avg conflicts / tx
1
Longest chain
6 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #108,335,562 · 17 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
wave w5
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w35w46w58w312w5
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb81
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x00000000…0019
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0xe6e12e88…713d
0xd32edf…ff58
11 touches
15 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x065c9d…c394
4 touches
1 conflict
0xca841faa…486a
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xaad6be10…0801
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
15 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity