← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #108,396,342
10 transactions · 10 stateful · 2026-09-27 06:41:31 UTC
Parallelism
40/100
Blocked
50%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.8
Longest chain
6 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #108,396,342 · 10 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
wave w5
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w14w25w07w38w49w5
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xd98b3c10…67b8
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x1045386d…cb88
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x9e489018…6035
0xd32edf…ff58
5 touches
3 conflicts
0x76e02d19…7609
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x7bd229ad…63b2
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0xf5dc501b…831c
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
3 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity