pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#108,496,045
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #108,496,045
25 transactions · 23 stateful · 2026-09-27 15:03:23 UTC
Parallelism
80
/100
Blocked
48
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.96
Longest chain
5
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#108,496,045
· 25 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 8
#9
0x5acec890
#10
0x59558d29
#11
0xe10c815c
#12
execOrders
#13
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#14
0x84403c1b
· blocks 1
#15
executeBatch
#17
0xed82b078
#18
0xed82b078
#19
0xed82b078
#21
transfer
#22
setData
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#5
0x5acec890
· blocks 3
#20
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#24
execOrders
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 2
#6
0x5acec890
· blocks 2
#16
0x3f5c179b
· blocks 1
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#7
0x5acec890
· blocks 1
#23
0xc7068c7b
#8
0x0c7abd22
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
5
w1
6
w2
7
w3
8
w4
14
w0
16
w2
20
w1
23
w3
24
w1
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x9fa1409b…0e57
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x2bd79e7b…9bb5
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0xca841faa…486a
0x34b655…2a6f
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x945d1dbe…e1d7
0xc8689a…ee79
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x280aaa58…1c52
0x34b655…2a6f
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
10 conflicts on slot
0x9fa1409ba2…2b0e57
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity