← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #108,517,449
14 transactions · 13 stateful · 2026-09-27 16:51:09 UTC
Parallelism
57/100
Blocked
38%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.07
Longest chain
6 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #108,517,449 · 14 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
wave w5
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
3w04w15w27w38w49w5
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0x00000000…001d
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb85
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
12 touches
15 conflicts
0xb9541ad9…e63f
0xd32edf…ff58
11 touches
15 conflicts
0xaad6be10…0801
0x2a68ba…90c5
4 touches
1 conflict
0x9c11d943…f33a
0x0555e3…2b9c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x46cb45de…a566
0x188d58…ea8e
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
15 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity