pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#108,681,947
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #108,681,947
27 transactions · 23 stateful · 2026-09-28 06:39:34 UTC
Parallelism
74
/100
Blocked
48
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.81
Longest chain
7
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#108,681,947
· 27 txs across 7 waves · depth 7
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
wave
w4
wave
w5
wave
w6
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 7
#6
0x59558d29
#7
0x59558d29
#8
0x59558d29
#11
0x5acec890
#13
0x928e4afa
#14
execPerpOps
#15
execPerpOps
#16
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#18
executeBatch
#19
0x3f5c179b
#22
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#23
transfer
#24
setData
#25
0x61d59c2d
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#10
0x5acec890
· blocks 2
#17
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#12
0x5acec890
#26
execOrders
#4
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#5
0x0c7abd22
#9
0xab083028
· blocks 1
#20
0xed82b078
· blocks 1
#21
0xed82b078
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
5
w4
9
w4
10
w1
12
w2
17
w1
20
w5
21
w6
26
w2
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0xf34802b3…9f0d
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xef16c118…8a8f
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0051
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xa04fd74d…a9eb
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
10 conflicts on slot
0xf34802b39f…f89f0d
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity