← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #108,940,435
22 transactions · 20 stateful · 2026-09-29 04:24:14 UTC
Parallelism
82/100
Blocked
30%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.41
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #108,940,435 · 22 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w39w013w116w120w021w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xba5743c7…21c4
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xa3aff33a…8327
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0056
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x063eca74…c2e2
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x5c421c70…c2f0
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity