← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #108,961,676
17 transactions · 14 stateful · 2026-09-29 06:11:47 UTC
Parallelism
71/100
Blocked
50%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.82
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #108,961,676 · 17 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w35w06w07w19w111w212w4
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x7322fb4a…635e
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x2313b4cb…99e9
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0040
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0057
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x0e64cf42…c998
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x1c7e70e2…fc21
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
10 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity