← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #108,964,670
10 transactions · 9 stateful · 2026-09-29 06:27:01 UTC
Parallelism
50/100
Blocked
56%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.2
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #108,964,670 · 10 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w35w48w09w3
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…001e
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb86
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…002e
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x6235638c…643c
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x572c2d0d…e2f7
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0x22e0cc1d…ad0d
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
10 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity