← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #109,131,204
18 transactions · 16 stateful · 2026-09-29 20:27:23 UTC
Parallelism
72/100
Blocked
44%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.72
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #109,131,204 · 18 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w35w47w08w19w010w116w017w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xd53220ed…4735
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xb50ba2b9…22d1
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0029
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0040
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0052
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x7bbc2892…4983
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
10 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity