← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #109,161,711
15 transactions · 13 stateful · 2026-09-29 23:01:18 UTC
Parallelism
67/100
Blocked
38%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.4
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #109,161,711 · 15 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w14w25w37w08w19w4
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…001a
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…002a
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x6235638c…6438
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xcb45d9d6…cb82
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xd9f18d9a…141d
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0xabd75ddf…d75f
0xd32edf…ff58
5 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…003d
0x851145…3f07
4 touches
1 conflict
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
3 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity