← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #109,176,406
15 transactions · 14 stateful · 2026-09-30 00:15:15 UTC
Parallelism
60/100
Blocked
57%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.13
Longest chain
6 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #109,176,406 · 15 txs across 6 waves · depth 6
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
wave w5
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w38w19w212w313w414w5
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…001a
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002a
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0040
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0053
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xb4e35dc8…3cc0
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000012
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity