← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #109,177,163
8 transactions · 7 stateful · 2026-09-30 00:19:04 UTC
Parallelism
50/100
Blocked
43%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.75
Longest chain
4 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #109,177,163 · 8 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w3
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd0ec60a1…d242
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x7993efdd…2e9b
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0002
0x125f12…a50b
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0009
0x125f12…a50b
4 touches
1 conflict
0x09000000…0001
0x000000…1000
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0053
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000013
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity