← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #109,228,273
30 transactions · 24 stateful · 2026-09-30 04:36:19 UTC
Parallelism
83/100
Blocked
38%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.5
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #109,228,273 · 30 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
2w03w14w25w36w47w08w19w420w223w024w126w029w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0xd996735f…8731
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x0e512c8e…20de
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…001b
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…002b
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0040
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0054
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
10 conflicts on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity