← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #110,210,415
12 transactions · 12 stateful · 2026-10-03 15:00:09 UTC
Parallelism
58/100
Blocked
58%
Avg conflicts / tx
1.17
Longest chain
5 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #110,210,415 · 12 txs across 5 waves · depth 5
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
wave w2
wave w3
wave w4
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w13w24w35w47w08w110w211w3
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x972da85f…50b1
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
10 touches
10 conflicts
0x72b91303…be0a
0xd32edf…ff58
9 touches
10 conflicts
0x00000000…0040
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0058
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x8a36e9bd…25c7
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
10 conflicts on slot 0x972da85f17…b950b1
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity