pev
.
→
scale
new
showcase
graph
analytics
feedback
offline
by Silk Nodes
pev
/
block
/
#110,887,614
← previous block
next block →
recent activity
Analyzing
Block #110,887,614
26 transactions · 25 stateful · 2026-10-05 23:49:51 UTC
Parallelism
85
/100
Blocked
44
%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.65
Longest chain
4
deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
Execution
Conflict
Heatmap
block
#110,887,614
· 26 txs across 4 waves · depth 4
parallel ↔ serial
wave
w0
wave
w1
wave
w2
wave
w3
#0
syscallReward
#1
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 5
#5
execute
#6
0x59558d29
#7
execOrders
· blocks 2
#11
execPerpOps
#12
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#13
0x3f5c179b
#15
0x3f5c179b
#16
0x84403c1b
· blocks 1
#18
0x57368ddf
#19
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#20
execFwdPositionOpsV2
· blocks 1
#21
execFwdPositionOpsV2
#23
setData
#2
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 3
#8
execOrders
· blocks 1
#17
0x84403c1b
#22
execOrders
· blocks 1
#24
execOrders
· blocks 1
#3
0x0c7abd22
· blocks 1
#9
execOrders
· blocks 1
#14
0x3f5c179b
#25
execOrders
#4
0x0c7abd22
#10
0x5acec890
parallel · wave 0, no conflicts
delayed · forced to wait
conflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1
w0
2
w1
3
w2
4
w3
7
w0
8
w1
9
w2
10
w3
14
w2
16
w0
17
w1
20
w0
22
w1
24
w1
25
w2
- write/write
- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x7322fb4a…635c
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
8 touches
6 conflicts
0xd09fd8a3…7583
0xd32edf…ff58
7 touches
6 conflicts
0x00000000…0055
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x0e64cf42…c996
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x1c7e70e2…fc21
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
0x00000000…0012
0x1b6862…e19c
6 touches
3 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer:
ShMonad (shMON)
6 conflicts on slot
0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block
·
next block →
recent activity