← previous blocknext block →recent activity
Analyzing
Block #111,931,060
13 transactions · 11 stateful · 2026-10-09 15:23:44 UTC
Parallelism
85/100
Blocked
27%
Avg conflicts / tx
0.23
Longest chain
2 deep
Execution timeline
did this block parallelize well?
view
block #111,931,060 · 13 txs across 2 waves · depth 2
parallel ↔ serial
wave w0
wave w1
parallel · wave 0, no conflictsdelayed · forced to waitconflict source · blocks others
Conflict graph
Blocked by
1w02w17w08w19w010w1
- write/write- - read/write
x = tx position · y = wave (depth)
Hot storage slots
Contention
0x00000000…0015
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xbde524f4…43bf
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x336486a4…20bd
0x34b655…2a6f
4 touches
1 conflict
0x083a8763…5a79
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0013
0x1b6862…e19c
4 touches
1 conflict
0xada59381…56ec
0xd32edf…ff58
3 touches
1 conflict
0x00000000…0019
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
0x00000000…0029
0x1b6862…e19c
2 touches
0 conflicts
What's blocking what?
Click any transaction in the timeline or graph to see which storage slots forced it to wait, and which later transactions it blocked.
The bottleneck
Throughput-killer: ShMonad (shMON)
1 conflict on slot 0x0000000000…000015
Audit this contract →
← previous block·next block →recent activity